In 1942, a group of advertising and industry executives created the War Advertising Council, to promote the war effort. The government compensated the companies that created or donated ads by allowing them to deduct some of their costs from their taxable incomes.
Renamed the Ad Council in 1943, the organization applied the same wartime persuasive techniques of advertising and psychological manipulation during the Cold War years, the post-war period when the geopolitical rivalry between the U.S., the USSR and their respective allies raged. One of their goals: promoting the virtues of capitalism and free enterprise in America while simultaneously demonizing the alternative – socialism – which was often conflated with communism.
Government propaganda at home portrayed the communist USSR as godless, tyrannical and antithetical to individual freedoms. As a counterpoint, America became everything the Soviet Union was not (continues).
This leads me to believe that if a socialist--or any other alternate economic philosophy--is going to gain a more effective role in American society, then much more has to be achieved on the level of public perception. Simply appealing to the statistical failures of capitalism, e.g. wealth inequality, minimum wages, etc., won't work, I think. I'm not saying that advocates for democratic socialism should start assembling the machines of propaganda . . . but looking at the amount of corporate power that was behind the Ad Council mentioned in the article suggests that a competitive campaign is going to take some bankrolling.
A big part of this is, following Hagglund, pointing out capitalism's failures, especially by using an immanent critique (301). That's an important step. It's worthwhile to convincingly show that capitalism doesn't make good on its most fundamental promise, freedom, notwithstanding its impressive ability to distract us from realizing this with unending streams of titillation (shout out to George Orwell).
A big part of this is, following Hagglund, pointing out capitalism's failures, especially by using an immanent critique (301). That's an important step. It's worthwhile to convincingly show that capitalism doesn't make good on its most fundamental promise, freedom, notwithstanding its impressive ability to distract us from realizing this with unending streams of titillation (shout out to George Orwell).
We've really bought in as a culture to the false equivalence of free markets and freedom (or spiritual freedom, in Hagglund's terminology). But the years just ahead promise to make the gap between those conceptions of freedom, especially with respect to the environment and public health, more glaring than ever before. As Ed has suggested in some of his recent posts, those young people who are really paying attention now can see through the deceptions of free market fundamentalists. If they stay engaged, there's every reason to expect a progressive shift in the center of political gravity in the years to come. If they don't, $$ (with its captured pols) will win again.
ReplyDeleteI agree Professor we have been tricked, we believe we have to work for our rights and working leads to success and thats why people fall in love with this idea of the American Dream. That ideology even goes into our lives we have to work for love we have to work for the approval of people instead of just being. This video was great and thought provoking.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteend of the week calulations
ReplyDeleteAtheism class
My comments were made on:
4/7/20- Sound of silence
4/7/20- Essential or Sacrificial
4/7/20 Midterm report On Humanism
4/7/20 Response to "An Atheist Funeral"
4/9/20 what’s the point … to move forward
4/9/20 DQ Quiz April 7th -9th
4/9/20 April 7th quiz DQ
4/9/20 Advertising Capitalism
8 bases = 2 homeruns