Atheism & Philosophy
PHIL 3310. Exploring the philosophical, ethical, spiritual, existential, social, and personal implications of a godless universe, and supporting their study at Middle Tennessee State University & beyond.
Monday, April 22, 2024
Religion as Make-Believe
...Sperber concluded that there are two kinds of beliefs. The first he has called "factual" beliefs. Factual beliefs—such as the belief that chairs exist and that leopards are dangerous—guide behavior and tolerate little inconsistency; you can't believe that leopards do and do not eat livestock. The second category he has called "symbolic" beliefs. These beliefs might feel genuine, but they're cordoned off from action and expectation. We are, in turn, much more accepting of inconsistency when it comes to symbolic beliefs; we can believe, say, that God is all-powerful and good while allowing for the existence of evil and suffering.
In a masterly new book, "Religion as Make-Believe" (Harvard), Neil Van Leeuwen, a philosopher at Georgia State University, returns to Sperber's ideas with notable rigor. He analyzes beliefs with a taxonomist's care, classifying different types and identifying the properties that distinguish them. He proposes that humans represent and use factual beliefs differently from symbolic beliefs, which he terms "credences." Factual beliefs are for modelling reality and behaving optimally within it. Because of their function in guiding action, they exhibit features like "involuntariness" (you can't decide to adopt them) and "evidential vulnerability" (they respond to evidence). Symbolic beliefs, meanwhile, largely serve social ends, not epistemic ones, so we can hold them even in the face of contradictory evidence...
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2024/04/22/dont-believe-what-theyre-telling-you-about-misinformation?_gl=1*5wkxo5*_up*MQ..&gclid=05dc19316ca81fce994f7f12f1af4029&gclsrc=3p.ds
faith in reason
— Bertrand Russell, The Prospects of Industrial Civilization
May 4
Saturday, April 20, 2024
Daniel Dennett (1942-2024)
Remembering speaking with Dennet in Chicago at the APA February 2020, Told him I appreciated his email correspondence back in the 90s (and then later when I asked if he could arrange a meeting with Dawkins). Sat across the aisle from him listening to Philip Kitcher and Martha Nussbaum at that meeting.
"...I saw with greater clarity than ever before in my life that when I say "Thank goodness!" this is not merely a euphemism for "Thank God!" (We atheists don't believe that there is any God to thank.) I really do mean thank goodness! There is a lot of goodness in this world, and more goodness every day, and this fantastic human-made fabric of excellence is genuinely responsible for the fact that I am alive today. It is a worthy recipient of the gratitude I feel today, and I want to celebrate that fact here and now…" https://www.edge.org/conversation/daniel_c_dennett-thank-goodness
Monday, March 25, 2024
Spirituality from a humanist perspective
- are positive experiences – and at the more powerful end of experiences in general, causing a surge of feeling;
- are fleeting – and we become conscious of them only when they are underway or are over;
- are personal and individual experiences – they're subjectively experienced even when they're shared;
- are not not intellectual or rational experiences – although they occur within ourselves and minds, they're not experiences to which you can ascribe any meaningful analysis (neither are they irrational experiences!).
- take you (metaphorically or imaginatively) outside of yourself – you feel as if you are connected to something bigger or more than yourself in some way.