Up@dawn 2.0

Wednesday, April 13, 2022

Secular 12 Step Members

Throughout my time in the circles of a 12 Step Program known as Narcotics Anonymous, I have been confounded by the concept of a higher power. The only recommended characteristics of a higher power are that it be “Loving, caring, and greater than (oneself)” according to the NA Basic Text. Most of the people I come into contact with simply say God is their Higher Power and call it a day. I have been confused with this from the jump because I feel it eliminates the concept of Free Will and turns a daily decision of abstinence from mood altering and mind changing substances, into simply a bestowed gift from God. It seems to eliminate all concepts of personal growth and accomplishment and turn it into a gratitude to God. The following will seek to work through what it means to have a higher power in a secular sense. I will be using two of my peers, who have a combined total of roughly 30 years clean, in order to work through their higher powers and see what it means to work a 12 step in a secular way. In doing so, I hope to show that even those with secular feelings can understand and incorporate 12 Step sentiments. 


How do you identify, with respect to religious or spiritual feelings? 

Mike: Atheist. I was raised religious, a preacher’s kid. I started doubting at about 6 or 7 years old, and had qualms with the Bible and my upbringing, as far as the people I was around. They felt the Bible was the literal world of God and when I questioned, I was told I just had to have faith. There were no concrete answers. 

Frank: Agnostic. A bit of Humanist. I was raised episcopalian and questioned faith at 9. I studied Buddhism for several years from 18-23 and didn’t like the organized religion aspect. It’s the ritualistic and superstitious acts that turned me away. 


What is a Higher Power? 

Mike: That’s a hard question to answer, man. I’ll answer in a twelve step Philosophy. “A Power greater than yourself.” Doesn’t necessarily have to be spiritual or religious in nature. When I started, I was told to try to figure out what a Higher Power wasn’t. I started that way. Then I looked at the opposite to see what my higher power could be. What attributes I wanted to attribute to it. I didn’t want it to be vengeful, unforgiving, no fire and brimstone, didn’t even want it to be supernatural. I had this dream back in the 80’s that I went to a proverbial heaven and there were all these doors. On top of each door was the name of a religion. I opened the door that said Protestant and the doors all opened to a bigger room. 

Frank: Kinda the same as Mike, but some of my experience with Spirituality, or my view, is that things can be more fluid and can evolve. It can also be diverse and not mutually exclusive, I.e., some religions have rivalries with each other and see themselves as one true faith. Spirituality to me is a house with many doors. 


What is your Higher Power? 

Mike: Positive energy. Basically, just the principles of the program. The program in and of itself. There’s just an energy I feel in the rooms when I attend meetings that I can’t seem to replicate on my own. If I apply the principles to my life, it gets better. A lot of it is just drawn from previous experience. A lot of it has just taken time. The NA Traditions have a lot to do with how I say what I say and what I do when I do things. I identify as an addict, and when I share a message I talk about principles, but I don’t necessarily believe you have to call them this. Ethical Values, moral codes, these are just what we call spiritual principles, they aren’t calling on any supernatural being or greater deity. These can exist independent of that. 

Frank: It changes for me often. Somedays I feel like an atheist, some days I feel like there’s something that can’t be proved. What I always rely on is spiritual principles and ideals. I trust people to keep me accountable. Whether it’s people in my network or more specifically my sponsor. I think there’s also this idea of a moral code that has been passed down even before modern religions existed, so its drawing on this ever-present moral code.  


How can this be reconciled with the recommendations of the Basic Text that it be loving, caring, and greater than yourself? 

Mike: In my view, my conception of a higher power is loving and caring. The majority of the people in my network- my go to people- are very loving and caring. The principles I practice are positive and loving and caring. The argument can be made that they are greater than my addiction, which is another parameter set on it. When I maintain contact with this, it takes away from my desire to use which makes it greater than my addiction. The idea is suggested, it doesn’t necessarily have to be to work. If your higher power works- it works. If your High Power hates you or doesn’t want what’s best for you but it keeps you from using, then what does it matter. 

Frank: To piggyback off Mike, the energy a group brings to a room can be loving and caring. That is one of the benefits of the fellowship- the community. By ourselves we aren’t much, but together we are greater than the sum of our parts. 


Final Comments or Concerns 

Mike: The twelve steps aren’t an end all be all to recovering from addiction. Other ways work for some people. A lot of people go for community, and I think that helps a lot. Just having that community of people doing the same thing you want to do. It’s very positive. We don’t keep track of members so who knows the overall effectiveness. It’s the best suit for me right now and has been for a long time, so I’ll keep doing what I am doing. 

Frank: Be excellent to each other and party on. Don’t be an asshole- the essence of the ten commandments. 


There are sizable populations of Secular NA Members in Toronto, New York, and all over the West Coast. The following interview is just a shining example of a, albeit minority, population of Secular Members in 12 Step Programs. It led me to believe that, although these members are not the majority, they are a shining example and embody the ideas the 12 Step Programs preach. The rejection of Supernaturalism seen in each of these people showcases the ability of Narcotics Anonymous to incorporate a loving and thriving atmosphere in any life- not just those of the religiously inclined- and demonstrates a truly pragmatic and pluralistic sentiment in the attitudes of its members. 



Russell’s guide to critical thinking

"Bertrand Russell's A Liberal Decalogue was written in the 1950s as a guide to critical thinking in an age when politics and society were littered with many popular fallacies.

Russell advised:

1. Do not feel absolutely certain of anything.

2. Do not think it worthwhile to proceed by concealing evidence, for the evidence is sure to come to light.

3. Never try to discourage thinking, for you are sure to succeed.

4. When you meet with opposition, even if it should be from your husband or your children, endeavour to overcome it by argument and not by authority, for a victory dependent upon authority is unreal and illusory.

5. Have no respect for the authority of others, for there are always contrary authorities to be found.

6. Do not use power to suppress opinions you think pernicious, for if you do the opinions will suppress you.

7. Do not fear to be eccentric in opinion, for every opinion now accepted was once eccentric.

8. Find more pleasure in intelligent dissent than in passive agreement, for, if you value intelligence as you should, the former implies a deeper agreement than the latter.

9. Be scrupulously truthful, even if the truth is inconvenient, for it is more inconvenient when you try to conceal it.

10. Do not feel envious of the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise, for only a fool will think that it is happiness."

— The Little Book of Humanism: Universal lessons on finding purpose, meaning and joy by Alice Roberts, Andrew Copson

Tuesday, April 12, 2022

Questions Apr 14

 AC 5-6; LBH -158. Presentations Conor, Gary

1. Strictly speaking, a theocracy is a state that claims what? 

2. What did Ayatollah Khomeini assert about all the "topic[s] in human life"? 

3. What have humans rights bodies said about the Church of England? What did the Queen say in defense of the C of E's role and status? And what will secularists still say?

4. Why did Lenin consider religion a barrier to universal equality and "humanity's destiny"? 

5. What changes in Albania and Cuba were precipitated by the collapse of the USSR in 1989? 

6. What do critics of secularism say about the public/private distinction? 

7. What is pillarization, and what is its practical impact? 

8. Thinking of secularism as a broad principle of separation between religious and political authority, we're encouraged to think of it as what?

9. What (and whose) phrase has been definitive of secularism for many?

10. What's Charles Taylor's objection to John Rawls's version of secularism?

11. Britain's National Secular Society says secularism is the best chance we have to do what?

DQ

  • Why do so many Americans falsely believe Christianity to be the "official" religion of the state?
  • Why do so many humans credit the second-hand testimony of others' "revelations"?
  • Don't most ancient texts fail to address nearly all the topics of modern life that matter to us?
  • Do you ever think about what a nightmare an American theocracy would be, with police enforcing religious practice etc.? Do you think it could ever happen?
  • Why aren't there more "atheist missionaries" today?
  • Are initiatives like Tennessee's new "Divisive Content" law (signed last week by the Governor) a significant step away from secularism in America?
  • What do you think of Burkean conservatism? Of Sarkozy's commitment to Catholicism and Savarkar's ethnic nationalism?
  • Is French secularism excessive?
  • Does secularism need to try harder than humanism to resist being perceived as hostile to religion? Should it downplay freedom from religion? 83-4


 My Two Weeks With the Atheists of Prague With Updates

Final Presentation by Gary Wedgewood
Atheism and Philosophy, PHIL 3310, Spring 2022

On the two Sunday’s we were in Prague, we attended the United Methodist Church where church members & ministers shared their experiences under communist rule when the church services would have visitors who were spying for the government & recording names of those attending the services…the only official and acceptable “religious” view under communist rule was Atheism.

William James…quotes James Henry Leuba as saying, “God is not known, he is not understood, he is used…if he proves himself useful, the religious consciousness can ask no more than that. Does God really exist? What is he? are irrelevant questions. Not God, but life, more life, a larger, richer, more satisfying life, is, in the last analysis, the end of religion.”

Richard Rorty in “Pragmatism as Anti-Authoritarianism”

From an interview with MARGARET ATWOOD …after I’d written “The Handmaid’s Tale,” it got made into a movie…We launched it in West Berlin…then we went across to East Berlin, and we launched it there. People watched it very intently and threw bouquets up on the stage afterwards and said, this was our life. And they didn’t mean the outfits. They meant you couldn’t talk to anybody because you didn’t know if they were spying on you…Prague was…similarly…shut down. So, we went in search of Kafka…no Kafka…very verboten…we then went back in ’89…there were Kafka handkerchiefs, Kafka playing cards…I went back a little bit later, and it was full-blown Kafka…There was a statue. There’s an award…I got the Kafka award. I was thrilled.

Thousands of Russians in Prague protest against war in Ukraine By Jason Hovet
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/thousands-russians-prague-protest-against-war-ukraine-2022-03-26/

PRAGUE, March 26 (Reuters) - Thousands of Russians marched through Prague on Saturday, waving the white-blue-white flag that has become a symbol of protests against Moscow's invasion of Ukraine. Carrying signs that read "Killer" over a picture of President Vladimir Putin and chanting "No to War", protesters walked from Prague's Peace Square through the centre of the Czech capital. Police put the number of marchers at about 3,000.

The Czech Republic is home to 45,000 Russians, the fourth largest foreign community in the former communist-ruled country. Nearly 200,000 Ukrainians lived in the Czech Republic - making them the biggest foreign community - before Russia's invasion of Ukraine on Feb. 24.
The Czech government estimates 300,000 Ukrainians have fled to the country.

Copson writes:  “The argument for secularism based on individual freedom is rooted in a particular understanding of human dignity. It starts from the assumption that, as far as is possible, we want to be free to make up our own minds about important questions.”

Copson, Andrew. Secularism (p. 47). Kindle Edition.

Discussion Questions:

  1. How is the prevalence of atheism or theism in a society tied to the political climate at any given time?
  2. What was it about Kafka that threatened the government and caused him to be banned at one time and revered at another time?
  3. Do you think the current attitude about Putin and the war in Ukraine might have differed at another time in the political history of the Czech Republic?
  4. Would you allow a government or political leader to influence what belief system you choose?

“Love is wise; hatred is foolish"

In A&P we're picking up our last required text, Andrew Copson's Secularism: A Very Short Introduction. I'm also recommending his and Alice Roberts's Little Book of Humanism: Universal lessons on finding purpose, meaning, and joy. His podcast What I Believe is good too.

I love that the LBH begins with that Kurt Vonnegut statement of welcome I'm always quoting... (continues)

Monday, April 11, 2022

The Value of Philosophy

 Gregory Slack's talk in Peck Hall on Tuesday, April 5 (video)...

and Bertrand Russell's concluding chapter in The Problems of Philosophy:

CHAPTER XV. THE VALUE OF PHILOSOPHY

Having now come to the end of our brief and very incomplete review of the problems of philosophy, it will be well to consider, in conclusion, what is the value of philosophy and why it ought to be studied. It is the more necessary to consider this question, in view of the fact that many men, under the influence of science or of practical affairs, are inclined to doubt whether philosophy is anything better than innocent but useless trifling, hair-splitting distinctions, and controversies on matters concerning which knowledge is impossible.

This view of philosophy appears to result, partly from a wrong conception of the ends of life, partly from a wrong conception of the kind of goods which philosophy strives to achieve. Physical science, through the medium of inventions, is useful to innumerable people who are wholly ignorant of it; thus the study of physical science is to be recommended, not only, or primarily, because of the effect on the student, but rather because of the effect on mankind in general. Thus utility does not belong to philosophy. If the study of philosophy has any value at all for others than students of philosophy, it must be only indirectly, through its effects upon the lives of those who study it. It is in these effects, therefore, if anywhere, that the value of philosophy must be primarily sought.

But further, if we are not to fail in our endeavour to determine the value of philosophy, we must first free our minds from the prejudices of what are wrongly called 'practical' men. The 'practical' man, as this word is often used, is one who recognizes only material needs, who realizes that men must have food for the body, but is oblivious of the necessity of providing food for the mind. If all men were well off, if poverty and disease had been reduced to their lowest possible point, there would still remain much to be done to produce a valuable society; and even in the existing world the goods of the mind are at least as important as the goods of the body. It is exclusively among the goods of the mind that the value of philosophy is to be found; and only those who are not indifferent to these goods can be persuaded that the study of philosophy is not a waste of time... (continues)