Up@dawn 2.0

Thursday, December 30, 2021

Redemption

"...politics should not try to be redemptive. But that is not because there is another sort of redemption available, the sort that Catholics believe is found in the Church. It is because redemption was a bad idea in the first place. Human beings need to be made happier, but they do not need to be redeemed, for they are not degraded beings, not immaterial souls imprisoned in material bodies, not innocent souls corrupted by original sin. They are, as Nietzsche put it, clever animals, clever because they, unlike the other animals, have learned how to cooperate with one another in order better to fulfill one another’s desires. In the course of history, we clever animals have acquired new desires, and we have become quite different from our animal ancestors. For our cleverness has not only enabled us to adjust means to ends, it has enabled us to imagine new ends, to dream up new ideals. Nietzsche, when he described the effects of the coolingoff of the sun, wrote: “And so the clever animals had to die.” He would have done better to have written: “And so the brave, imaginative, idealistic, self-improving animals had to die.” The notion of redemption presupposes a distinction between the lower, mortal, animal parts of the soul, and the higher, spiritual, immortal part. Redemption is what would occur when the higher finally triumphs over the lower, when reason conquers passion, or when grace defeats sin. In much of the onto-theological tradition, the lower-higher distinction is construed as a distinction between the part that is content with finitude and the part that yearns for the infinite."

"An Ethics for Today: Finding Common Ground Between Philosophy and Religion" by Richard Rorty: https://a.co/eRonvvd

Wednesday, December 29, 2021

“All deities reside in the human breast"

"Rorty concludes by holding out the hope that pragmatism, like romanticism, might yet serve as a means for holding out hope—hope that we might someday come to realize that we and we alone are responsible for dreaming up new and more humane ways to live:

If pragmatism is of any importance—if there is any difference between pragmatism and Platonism that might eventually make a difference to practice—it is not because it got something right that Platonism got wrong. It is because accepting a pragmatist outlook would change the cultural ambience for the better. It would complete the process of secularization by letting us think of the desire for non-linguistic access to the real as as hopeless as that for redemption through a beatific vision. Taking this extra step toward acknowledging our finitude would give a new resonance to Blake’s dictum that “All deities reside in the human breast.”

Philosophy as Poetry (Page-Barbour Lectures)" by Richard Rorty, intro by  Michael Bérubé https://a.co/iKgeGSf

Monday, December 27, 2021

Rachel Held Evans

E.O. Wilson, a Pioneer of Evolutionary Biology, Dies at 92

A Harvard professor for 46 years, he was an expert on insects and explored how natural selection and other forces could influence animal behavior. He then applied his research to humans.

...During his baptism, he became keenly aware that he felt no transcendence. "And something small somewhere cracked," Dr. Wilson wrote. He drifted away from the church.

"I had discovered that what I most loved on the planet, which was life on the planet, made sense only in terms of evolution and the idea of natural selection," Dr. Wilson later told the historian Ullica Segerstrale, "and that this was a far more interesting, richer and more powerful explanation than the teachings of the New Testament."
...
nyt

Monday, December 20, 2021

French Secularism Leaves Little Room for Religion - The Atlantic

…When I look at France, I have to admire an educational system that at least tries to give everyone a common grounding in the core principles of national life. At a time when everything is being privatized, from running elections to fighting wars, it's useful to be reminded that there is something important called "public space," beyond the market economy, and that we must protect it. In the Cartesian construct that is France, there's a place in the garden for any flower that accepts the design. But as laïcité illustrates, the formal system can be rigid and unforgiving. Individuals and groups are constrained by law in ways that have no parallel in other democracies. The French may be more multicultural in practice than in theory, but theory carries weight. In France, individuals are expected to suppress fundamental parts of themselves in public life.


This article appears in the December 2021 print edition with the headline "France's God Complex."

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2021/12/france-god-religion-secularism/620528/

Sunday, December 19, 2021

Read the syllabus

Professor Put Clues to a Cash Prize in His Syllabus. No One Noticed.
Tucked into the second page of the syllabus was information about a locker number and its combination. Inside was a $50 bill, which went unclaimed.

Kenyon Wilson, a professor at the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, wanted to test whether any of his students fully read the syllabus for his music seminar.

Of the more than 70 students enrolled in the class, none apparently did.

Professor Wilson said he knows this because on the second page of the three-page syllabus he included the location and combination to a locker, inside of which was a $50 cash prize.

"Free to the first who claims; locker one hundred forty-seven; combination fifteen, twenty-five, thirty-five," read the passage in the syllabus. But when the semester ended on Dec. 8, students went home and the cash was unclaimed.

"My semester-long experiment has come to an end," Mr. Wilson wrote on Facebook, adding: "Today I retrieved the unclaimed treasure."
...

Tuesday, December 14, 2021

John Gray, anti-humanist

"Darwin showed that humans are like other animals, humanists claim they are not. Humanists insist that by using our knowledge we can control our environment and flourish as never before. In affirming this, they renew one of Christianity's most dubious promises–that salvation is open to all. The humanist belief in progress is only a secular version of this Christian faith. In the world shown us by Darwin, there is nothing that can be called progress. To anyone reared on humanist hopes this is intolerable. As a result, Darwin's teaching has been stood on its head, and Christianity's cardinal error–that humans are different from all other animals–has been given a new lease on life." — Straw Dogs: Thoughts on Humans and Other Animals by John Gray
==
Refutation of John Gray's anti-humanismIn his 2018 book Seven Types of Atheism, John Gray gives his understanding and opinions on seven ways that Western thinkers have fashioned worldviews free of Western monotheism. Gray rejects secular humanism as an attractive worldview, additionally rejecting four other manifestations of atheism. We believe Gray's rejection of secular humanism is poorly founded and merits debate... secularhumanism.org

Time



Phil.Oliver@mtsu.edu
👣Solvitur ambulando
💭Sapere aude

Monday, December 13, 2021

The Burden of Refuting the Preposterous | Interfaith Now

Do atheists and theists have the same burden of proof in supporting their respective negative and positive claims about God?

I'd like to remind us of some factors that are often overlooked in discussions of this question, not the least of which is that theistic religions are preposterous...

https://medium.com/interfaith-now/atheism-and-the-burden-of-refuting-the-preposterous-53aba4657168

Saturday, December 4, 2021

This Life handout

Friday, November 19, 2021

Why Are Americans Still Uncomfortable with Atheism?

...All of us, nihilists included, believe something—many things, in fact, about ourselves, the cosmos, and one another. In the end, the most interesting thing about a conscience is how it answers, not whom it answers to. 

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/10/29/why-are-americans-still-uncomfortable-with-atheism?utm_source=onsite-share&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=onsite-share&utm_brand=the-new-yorker

Tuesday, November 9, 2021

Carl Sagan: we are star stuff

It’s the birthday of the man that Smithsonian Magazine called “truly irreplaceable:” that’s astronomer Carl Sagan (books by this author), born in Brooklyn (1934). Sagan was a popular guest on TV shows, especially The Tonight Show, but he was also a serious scientist who worked as a consultant on several unmanned NASA missions. Sagan was involved in the “Golden Record” project associated with the Voyager missions. The record was imprinted with images and recordings from Earth, in case it should be discovered by a form of intelligent life. It was on this project that Sagan met Ann Druyan. She was the creative director of the project and, eventually, Sagan’s wife. Druyan later said, “Carl and I knew we were the beneficiaries of chance, that pure chance could be so kind that we could find one another in the vastness of space and the immensity of time. We knew that every moment should be cherished as the precious and unlikely coincidence that it was.”

Most people know him best as the co-creator and host of the hugely popular PBS show Cosmos, which aired in 1980. Sagan originally planned to call the show Man and the Cosmos but he considered himself a feminist so he decided to leave off the “man.” Seth MacFarlane, the creator of the animated TV series Family Guy and a lifelong astronomy enthusiast, collaborated with Ann Druyan, Sagan’s widow, to bring Cosmos back to television in 2014. MacFarlane also donated money to the Library of Congress so that the library could purchase Sagan’s papers from Druyan. And there were a lot of papers: almost 800 boxes.

Sagan received a lot of fan mail over his career, many letters from people who shared their dreams and experiences, or their theories of extraterrestrial life, or simply thanked him for teaching them about astronomy. The more “out there” of the letters were filed in a box labeled “F/C,” which stood for “fissured ceramics” — Sagan’s code name for “crackpots.” People wrote to him about aliens that they had imprisoned in their basement or the planets they had discovered. He was also approached by Timothy Leary, the former Harvard professor and leader in the counterculture movement of the 1960s. Leary wanted to build a kind of “space ark” and transport hundreds of people to a different star and he consulted Sagan to find out which star he should aim for. Sagan had to tell him that the technology to pull off such a feat did not currently exist. Leary wrote back, “I am not impressed with your conclusions in these areas,” and suggested that all that was needed was “exo-psychological and neuropolitical inspiration.”

Sagan died in 1996 of complications from a rare bone marrow disease. He was 62. He didn’t believe in life after death and once told his daughter, Sasha, that it was dangerous to believe in something just because you want very badly for it to be true. But he also told her, “We are star stuff” and made her feel the wonder of being alive.

From Sagan’s book Pale Blue Dot (1994), the title of which refers to a photo of Earth taken from billions of miles away:

“That’s here. That’s home. That’s us. On it, everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you have ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives […] [E]very king and peasant, every young couple in love, every mother and father, hopeful child, inventor and explorer, every revered teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every superstar, every supreme leader, every saint and sinner in the history of our species lived there — on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam.” WA


"Carl admired James's definition of religion as a "feeling of being at home in the universe," quoting it at the conclusion of Pale Blue Dot..."

Saturday, October 30, 2021

The Afterlife of Rachel Held Evans

 I followed her on Twitter, before her death in 2019 at just age 37. She was the thinking person's evangelical. Pride of Dayton TN.

"With humility and openness, Held Evans helped reintroduce a mode of spiritual inquiry in America that was based in seeking mystery, not certainty. "She made Christianity seem like a decent place to be while you asked questions, rather than something you had to abandon to be free," Kathryn Lofton, a professor of religious studies at Yale, said. Held Evans quickly became a major spiritual figure, appearing on television shows and serving as one of President Obama's faith advisers. "I think Rachel would be the first person to scoff at any attempt to beatify her," Sarah Bessey, her friend, told me. "She's one of the few spiritual teachers I've known who had the humility to regularly ask herself, 'What if I'm wrong?' "
https://www.newyorker.com/news/on-religion/the-afterlife-of-rachel-held-evans

Wednesday, October 27, 2021

Rorty

 
 
Michael S Roth
⁦‪@mroth78‬⁩
My take on Dick Rorty: "Pragmatists can only point out that we depend on one another & thus should develop narratives that will encourage us to listen to one another in order to find more inclusive solutions to the problems that plague us" ⁦‪@LAReviewofBooks‬⁩ lareviewofbooks.org/article/we-can…
 
10/27/21, 10:48 AM
 
 

"[W]e do not, if I am right, need a theory of rationality, we do need a narrative of maturation." He is committed to the anti-authoritarian Enlightenment project of replacing obedience to the Divine (whether in the shape of a deity or a monarch) with obedience only to "a law one gives oneself," as Rousseau and Kant had it. We may arrive at an agreement about the laws we give ourselves — we don't discover the One True Law. Pragmatism is anti-authoritarian because it rejects the notion that we need something nonhuman (God, Reality, Truth) for our salvation.



Saturday, October 23, 2021

Thursday, October 7, 2021

A&P returns to campus!

 Returning to MTSU

January 2022

PHIL 3310, Atheism & Philosophy
T & Th, 2:40 pm, James Union Building 202


This year’s theme: Atheism, humanism, and secularism

TEXTS
"Atheism is often considered to be a negative, dark, and pessimistic belief characterized by a rejection of values and purpose and a fierce opposition to religion. Baggini shows how a life without religious belief can be positive, meaningful, and moral."
"The humanist is not simply one who denies the truth of religious belief, but one who believes we can enjoy meaningful, purposeful, and good lives without religion. And far from embracing moral nihilism, humanists are often deeply committed people, to be found at the forefront of many important ethical campaigns."
    "Kitcher thoughtfully and sensitively considers how secularism can respond to the worries and challenges that all people confront, including the issue of mortality. He investigates how secular lives compare with those of people who adopt religious doctrines as literal truth, as well as those who embrace less literalistic versions of religion. Whereas religious belief has been important in past times, Kitcher concludes that evolution away from religion is now essential. He envisions the successors to religious life, when the senses of identity and community traditionally fostered by religion will instead draw on a broader range of cultural items—those provided by poets, filmmakers, musicians, artists, scientists, and others."
"Anti-authoritarianism, on this view, means acknowledging that our cultural inheritance is always open to revision because no authority exists to ascertain the truth, once and for all. If we cannot rely on the unshakable certainties of God or nature, then all we have left to go on—and argue with—are the opinions and ideas of our fellow humans. The test of these ideas, Rorty suggests, is relatively simple: Do they work? Do they produce the peace, freedom, and happiness we desire?"




For more info: phil.oliver@mtsu.edu 

Sunday, October 3, 2021

Why Are Americans Still Uncomfortable with Atheism?

"...Christians ignorant of their own history, for instance, will be surprised to learn that their earliest ancestors in the faith were themselves ridiculed as “atheists” because they refused to participate in polytheistic worship: in Greek, atheos means “without gods,” not anti-God. Meanwhile, those who came to atheism via the new atheists might be startled to find that many of their intellectual forebears did not wage war on religion, or even feel any distaste for it.


In fairness, contemporary American atheists Christians ignorant of their own history, for instance, will be surprised to learn that their earliest ancestors in the faith were themselves ridiculed as “atheists” because they refused to participate in polytheistic worship: in Greek, atheos means “without gods,” not anti-God. Meanwhile, those who came to atheism via the new atheists might be startled to find that many of their intellectual forebears did not wage war on religion, or even feel any distaste for it.

In fairness, contemporary American atheists may be inclined to wage war on religion because religion has been waging war on them for so long.share&utm_brand=the-new-yorker

Mencken

Once upon a time a guy like this could be a major newspaper columnist even in America: https://t.co/VxREcxFlzo
(https://twitter.com/BrianLeiter/status/1444680308985667595?s=02)

Thursday, August 26, 2021

The New Chief Chaplain at Harvard? An Atheist.

The elevation of Greg Epstein, author of “Good Without God,” reflects a broader trend of young people who increasingly identify as spiritual but religiously nonaffiliated.

The Puritan colonists who settled in New England in the 1630s had a nagging concern about the churches they were building: How would they ensure that the clergymen would be literate? Their answer was Harvard University, a school that was established to educate the ministry and adopted the motto “Truth for Christ and the Church.” It was named after a pastor, John Harvard, and it would be more than 70 years before the school had a president who was not a clergyman.


Nearly four centuries later, Harvard’s organization of chaplains has elected as its next president an atheist named Greg Epstein, who takes on the job this week...

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/26/us/harvard-chaplain-greg-epstein.html?smid=em-share

Tuesday, August 17, 2021

Sacred matter

Wednesday, August 11, 2021

The Brights

 They're a species of Humanist. Their latest bulletin just arrived in my email.

Who are The Brights?

  • We are participants in an international internet constituency of individuals. All of us have a naturalistic worldview, free of supernatural or mystical elements.
  • A Bright's ethics and actions are based on a naturalistic worldview.
  • The Brights aspire to an egalitarian civic vision. We want citizens who have a naturalistic worldview to be accepted as full participants in civil society

Definitions:
A "super" (noun) is a person whose worldview includes supernatural and/or mystical elements.
A "bright" (n.) is a person whose worldview is naturalistic (no supernatural and mystical elements).
A "Bright" is a bright who has registered at this website in support of the egalitarian civic vision of the Brights movement.

What is the Challenge?

Currently, the naturalistic worldview is insufficiently expressed within most cultures - even politically and socially repressed. To be a Bright is to participate in a movement to address the situation.

There is a great diversity of persons who have a naturalistic worldview. Some are members of existing organizations that foster a supernatural-free perspective, but far more are not associated with any formal group or label. Under the broad umbrella of the naturalistic worldview, participants in the constituency of Brights can undertake social and civic actions designed to influence a society otherwise permeated with supernaturalism.

This website registers brights into the constituency (of Brights) and serves as a communications hub for actions that align with the aims and principles of the Brights movement.

(continues)

Monday, August 9, 2021

"radically in favor of knowing"

NASA’s New Telescope Will Show Us the Infancy of the Universe

...The seventeenth-century astronomer Johannes Kepler studied the physical world for the messages he felt that God had written into the Book of Nature. Galileo, in fact, had supporters inside and outside the Church. Sometimes people in power have been reluctant to acknowledge the truths that science uncovers. Each time we look farther, our universe gets larger. Or, depending on your perspective, we get smaller. Astronomers take the position—an incidentally ethical one—of being radically in favor of knowing.

Bob Williams, the former head of the Space Telescope Science Institute, grew up in a Baptist family in Southern California, one of five children. He’d wanted to be an astronomer since the seventh grade, when he received a pamphlet on astronomy in science class; he then saved his paper-route money to buy a telescope. He earned a scholarship to U.C. Berkeley and studied astronomy there. “My father didn’t want me to go to college,” he said. “He told me that if I went to get an education I would lose my faith. And he was right about that. We were raised to take every word in the Bible as literally true. But then I was learning about continental drift. About evolution.” Williams said that he is often asked about faith. Many traditions use the term “God” to mean, basically, everything that is. In that view, the universe itself is the Book, and astronomers are reading it as it is.

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/08/16/nasas-new-telescope-will-show-us-the-infancy-of-the-universe?utm_source=onsite-share&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=onsite-share&utm_brand=the-new-yorker

Friday, July 30, 2021

Humanist summer reading

 From the AHA website: "Our Humanist summer reading list..."



Monday, July 19, 2021

The Best Books on Humanism | Five Books Expert Recommendations

What is 'humanism?' Is it just another word for atheism?

It's not just another word for atheism. The word 'humanism', like all words with long histories, has had lots of meanings at different times in different places. In English, it started being used in the 19th century. Since then, it's had two uses. One is a historical one, to refer back to the culture and scholarship of the Renaissance. We usually call that 'Renaissance humanism'.

The second use of the word has been to refer to a non-religious worldview: a set of beliefs and values that together constitute a certain approach to life. The precise content of those beliefs and values is up for debate and up for negotiation—just like any idea in the history of ideas. But, broadly speaking, humanists are people who don't look outside of reality for moral guidance or ways to understand the universe. They try to understand the world that we live in by the use of reason, evidence, and experience all bundled together in the scientific method...

https://fivebooks.com/best-books/humanism/


Phil.Oliver@mtsu.edu
👣Solvitur ambulando
💭Sapere aude

Baggini's Very Short Intro, 2d ed.

Nietzsche's dad

Saturday, July 17, 2021

Can Silicon Valley Find God?

Artificial intelligence promises to remake the world. These believers are fighting to make sure thousands of years of text and tradition find a place among the algorithms.

Spirituality, whether pursued via faithfulness, tradition or sheer exploration, is a way of connecting with something larger than oneself. It is perhaps no surprise that tech companies have discovered that they can be that "something" for their employees. Who needs God when we've got Google?
...

Thursday, July 1, 2021

Humanist of the Year

Saturday, June 12, 2021

Good without gods

What do David Hume and Jane Austen have in common? Both are picked by British philosopher Mary Warnock as among the five best books on morality without a God. Read more: https://t.co/hnGzeyq95y
(https://twitter.com/five_books/status/1403608066751451137?s=02)

Saturday, June 5, 2021

Godless grifters: How the New Atheists merged with the far right | Salon.com

Hmm...
https://www.salon.com/2021/06/05/how-the-new-atheists-merged-with-the-far-right-a-story-of-intellectual-grift-and-abject-surrender/


Phil.Oliver@mtsu.edu
👣Solvitur ambulando
💭Sapere aude

Monday, May 31, 2021

Best books on godless morality

Five Books (@five_books) tweeted at 7:45 AM on Mon, May 31, 2021:
What do David Hume and Jane Austen have in common? Both are picked by British philosopher Mary Warnock as among the five best books on morality without a God. Read more: https://t.co/hnGzeyq95y
(https://twitter.com/five_books/status/1399346213875499011?s=02)

Sunday, May 9, 2021

A tangled web

I've become an atheist, but most of my family is Catholic. I love my sister very much, but we're not in the habit of sharing our views on things like religion or politics. So far as she knows, I'm still Catholic.

She recently had a child, and I was very honored to be named the baby's godmother. However, my sister's very strict Catholic parish allows only "practicing" Catholics to be godparents. There's a form you must submit from your parish (signed by your priest) as proof of your participation. I probably should have come clean then, but I didn't want to have my godmother status revoked. So I figured I would sign up with a new parish, become a member and do whatever I needed to do (go to church a few times, whatever) to get it done. 

Because of Covid, the parish waived all the things they normally do when bringing in a new member: tours of the parish, meeting with the priest, etc. Everyone I talked to was extremely nice. After a few days, they made me a member and signed the godparent form from the other church.

So I was able to be godmother at my niece's baptism. I figured all was well, and I could just forget about it. But now an individual from the church I signed up with has reached out wanting to talk about my faith needs and about how I want to get involved when things open up again. I feel bad. Catholicism is just not part of my life anymore, and I feel bad lying to them. Should I just tell them the truth and thank them for their time? Ignore it and hope they forget? Or go to church a few times and do whatever else to make amends? Name Withheld

—Oh, dear. The amount of weaving that went into this tangled web of well-meaning deception...

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/04/magazine/abortion-rights-donations.html?referringSource=articleShare


Phil.Oliver@mtsu.edu
👣Solvitur ambulando
💭Sapere aude

Saturday, April 17, 2021

Stop the foist

In a pandemic, with so much at stake, the Tennessee Statehouse needs to stop attempting to foist Christianity upon the residents of the state and start working to address their real needs. https://t.co/8zJXBUKLPZ
(https://twitter.com/FFRF/status/1383147172267487237?s=02)

Sunday, April 4, 2021

Humanist reading list

Humanist ideas are not a recent phenomenon, but have been around for millennia, says Andrew Copson (@AndrewCopson), chief executive of @Humanists_UK. He explains why it's worth making a positive choice to be a humanist and recommends a great reading list. https://t.co/JEZyrloFm7
(https://twitter.com/five_books/status/1378625932768993281?s=02)

Saturday, April 3, 2021

Secular Easter

The loss of traditions and holidays can be hard for nonbelievers, but Easter doesn't have to be about religion. Spring celebrations have been around long before Christianity, so feel free to celebrate however you like. https://t.co/hnjk5I6i3d
(https://twitter.com/RFRorg/status/1378381604922478594?s=02)

Wednesday, March 24, 2021

Saturday, March 20, 2021

"no religious basis is necessary"

...ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death.--Albert Einstein
(https://twitter.com/tpmquote/status/1373046635996049411?s=02)

Monday, March 15, 2021

Martin Hagglund on Marx, Hegel, and This Life

 Excited to publish this essay @LAReviewofBooks on Marx, Hegel, and This Life, which both synthesizes my thinking and develops it in new ways. If you're only going to read one essay I have written, I recommend this one. Please share if you are so inclined!

https://t.co/8VDgXq38V8
(https://twitter.com/martinhaegglund/status/1371440942331400194?s=02)

Saturday, March 6, 2021

Kurt's favorite joke

If I should ever die, God forbid, I hope you will say, "Kurt is up in heaven now." That's my favorite joke.
(https://twitter.com/Kurt_Vonnegut/status/1368110874943176704?s=02)