While driving and listening to NPR this morning, I heard what I think was a local report (WPLN) about our own U.S. Senator Marsha Blackburn. It turns out that Senator Blackburn has been acting as a champion for free speech. This reminded me of Ben's challenging and valuable presentation on censorship.
Of course, I disagree with the senator on a host of other issues. But I think this is a good thing. My doubts about the optimism presupposed by the idea of an "intellectual marketplace" are still several. It seems to me that too extreme a stance against censorship disregards our contemporary struggle with information in a digital age. Moreover, when it comes to this sort of thing, I'm with Plato: for the sake of a social formation agreed upon as desirable, let's censor the poets. What I appreciate about Blackburn's resolution, though, is that it distinguishes the environment of higher education as a "public forum." So, there's legitimate cause to loosen the reigns in a space where "adult" minds are searching out Truth. Still, even with that, we need Socrates (more than one) to serve as midwife!
Just don't tell Marsha about our course, I'm not confident that she and her allies really value all representations of academic freedom on the public university campus!
ReplyDeleteHa, I agree! That is one of the major contentions with free speech discourse. It's nominally open to all viewpoints, but in practice it's about advancing conservative ideas.
DeleteFree speech is all fun and games until someone disagrees with you and makes you mad. Fake news!
ReplyDeleteI definitely disagree with Blackburn on a lot of issues, but I can definitely get behind free speech. The balance to strike between censorship and free speech is a tricky one, but I think that overall, universities are a place to have those controversial and uncomfortable conversations. Otherwise, we likely wouldn't be able to take this lovely course about atheism in the middle of Tennessee.
ReplyDelete